Read the previous entry in the series here.
Read the next entry in the series here.
A message from Erek to the head birdkeeper for the Traders noting evidence of perfidy precedes “Blood Price.” The chapter opens with Selden waking suddenly as Chalcedean soldiers barge into Chassim’s rooms. They are tasked with retrieving Selden for the Duke, and Selden accompanies them rather than allowing Chassim to fight and likely be injured. Once brought before the Duke, Selden is bled for the Duke’s sustenance, and he loses consciousness.

Image is of Orlok from the 1922 Nosferatu, pulled from Wikipedia here and reported as public domain.
Eilik looks on in disgust at the actions of the Duke and urges him to release his hold on Selden. The Duke relents and bids that Selden be tended in advance of another feeding. Eilik finds his situation altered and begins plotting to improve it.
Andronicus has himself taken to Chassim’s chambers. There, he confers with her openly about her attempts to take power, commending her attempts and offering to make her his heir outright in exchange for her continued compliance.
Later, Selden wakes as Chassim tends him. The two confer about their respective situations, Chassim urging him to endurance. And the two begin to plot together.
I think it might be of interest to conduct some kind of rhetorical analysis on the messages that appear at the beginnings of chapters; that preceding “Blood Price” seems particularly apt for such an exercise. Were I teaching the Elderlings novels again, I think it might be a useful exercise for students to untangle the ethos, logos, and pathos appeals in Erek’s message to Kerig, here; I can also think that it would be a good example to provide to students before having them select a message of their own to analyze similarly.
I find that I am once again taken by Chassim’s seeming acceptance of her abuse and constraints. The present chapter does make mention of her resistance, notably in the throwing of heavy objects (explicit) and in flight (implicit from the exhortation to lock her door again), and the fact that it is an ongoing thing is strangely hopeful. That it has to be an ongoing thing, that it is one that is reported to be long ongoing, is less so. But perhaps that is me once again reading affectively and reading an earlier text against present circumstances and social trends. I am not alone in looking at the world and seeing that it is going ways that may not be to its benefit, and I doubt I am alone in seeing those ways presaged in the fictions of (not too many) years past. I do not ascribe any particular set of political positions to an author based upon a work of fiction; yes, writers write what they know, but it is possible for people to know what they don’t believe and to write that. I am not aware of any overt statement from Hobb in that line (which does not mean there isn’t one, just that I don’t know about it). But that a given author may or may not believe in one way or another doesn’t mean that such belief doesn’t show up in the work, reflecting the “now” of composition or underlying cultural currents that still flow and bubble up.
Like the work I do? Maybe see what I can do for you; contact me at the form below, and we’ll talk!
I’m happy to write to order for you; fill out the form below to get your piece started!




