Sample Topic Proposal: Why Not Have a Rhetoric Requirement among UL Lafayette PhD Students in English?

What follows is a topic proposal such as my students are asked to write for the Prop assignment during the Spring 2016 instructional term at Northern Oklahoma College. As is expected of student work, it treats an issue of its writer’s curriculum. It also adheres to the length requirements expressed to students (they are asked for 300 to 500 words, exclusive of heading, title, and page numbers; the sample below is 372 words long when judged by those standards), although its formatting will necessarily differ from student submissions due to the differing medium. How the medium influences reading is something well worth considering as a classroom discussion, particularly for those students who are going into particularly writing- or design-intensive fields.

I received a doctorate in English from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette in 2012, having completed a dissertation in late medieval literature and having passed with distinction comprehensive examinations in medieval English literature, early modern English literature, early American literature, and fantasy literature of the United States and Britain from 1950 to 2009 (when I sat for my exams). Composing the dissertation and studying for the exams, as well as taking the coursework that informed both, offered me rewarding experiences that I am glad to have had, as well as enabling many others outside the classroom that have been to my benefit.

Even so, they did not wholly equip me for the kind of work I have faced since leaving the school. The comprehensive exams, particularly, are discussed by the English Department that requires them in terms of both research and teaching, but most of the teaching that I and others who have earned graduate degrees through the Department has been in rhetoric and composition. Even those of us whose areas of interest and expertise are wholly literary are asked to teach more writing than anything else—and it is not something for which we are adequately prepared. Yet those students who concentrate in rhetoric and composition are prepared to teach literature, compelled to sit for exams in literary areas even as literature students are not obliged to sit for an exam in rhetoric.

Why no such requirement is in place bears some inquiry. The PhD program in English at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette is explicitly generalist in its orientation, and requiring all students to take an examination in rhetoric—effectively calling for them to take coursework in rhetoric, as well—would reinforce that orientation. Additionally, it would, as is gestured toward above, help students prepare more effectively for an academic job market that will call most of them to spend time teaching writing courses off of the tenure track, whatever their specialization may be. The Department and its doctoral students would therefore be better placed within the academy, helping the Department to continue offering its graduate programs and its graduates to secure employment in the short and long terms.

Class Report: ENGL 1213 at NOC, 13 January 2016

Class time was taken up with the diagnostic exercise indicated on the course syllabus.

Students are reminded of the following due dates:

  • Prop RV (electronically before class begins, 3 February 2016)
  • Prop FV (electronically before class begins, 10 February 2016)
  • Explore RV (electronically before class begins, 24 February 2016)

The section met as scheduled, at 1300 in North Classroom Building Room 311. The class roster showed eleven students enrolled, a loss of 13 since the previous report; fifteen withdrew and two added. Nine attended, verified through submission of the diagnostic exercise.

No students attended office hours.

Class Reports: ENGL 1213, Sections 015, 023, and 040–13 January 2016

Class time was taken up with the diagnostic exercise indicated on the course syllabus.

Students are reminded of the following due dates:

  • StratRdg Txt (in print as class begins on 20 January 2016) **This is a new addition; see the StratRdg assignment sheet for details.**
  • StratRdg PV (in print as class begins on 25 January 2016)
  • StratRdg RV (via D2L before class begins on 29 January 2016)

Regarding meetings and attendance:

  • Section 015 met as scheduled, at 1030 in Classroom Building Room 217. The class roster showed 19 students enrolled, unchanged since the previous report. All attended, verified through submission of the diagnostic exercise.
  • Section 023 met as scheduled, at 1130 in Classroom Building Room 121. The class roster showed 19 students enrolled, marking no net change since the previous report; four withdrew, and four others added themselves. Eighteen attended, verified through submission of the diagnostic exercise.
  • Section 040 met as scheduled, at 0830 in Morrill Hall Room 206. The class roster showed 18 students enrolled, a net loss of one since the previous report; four withdrew, and three added themselves. Thirteen attended, verified through submission of the diagnostic exercise.
  • No students attended office hours.

Class Report: ENGL 1213 at NOC, 11 January 2016

Discussion treated introductory concerns of the course. Noted were the online presence of the syllabus and course calendar, as well as the course blogs of which this is the first entry of the term.

Students are reminded of the following due dates:

  • Prop RV (electronically before class begins, 3 February 2016)
  • Prop FV (electronically before class begins, 10 February 2016)
  • Explore RV (electronically before class begins, 24 February 2016)

The section met as scheduled, at 1300 in North Classroom Building Room 311. The roster listed 25 students enrolled. Twelve attended, verified by sign-in sheet.

No students attended office hours.

Class Reports: ENGL 1213, Sections 015, 023, and 040–11 January 2016

Discussion treated introductory concerns of the course. Noted were the online presence of the syllabus and course calendar, as well as the course blogs of which this is the first entry of the term.

Students are reminded of the following due dates:

  • Diagnostic Exercise (in class, 13 January 2016)
  • StratRdg PV (in print at the beginning of class, 25 January 2016)
  • StratRdg RV (via D2L before the beginning of class, 29 January 2016)

Regarding meetings and attendance:

  • Section 015 met as scheduled, at 1030 in Classroom Building Room 217. The class roster showed 19 students enrolled. Eighteen attended, verified by sign-in sheet. Student participation was subdued.
  • Section 023 met as scheduled, at 1130 in Classroom Building Room 121. The class roster showed 19 students enrolled. Seventeen attended, verified by sign-in sheet. Student participation was limited.
  • Section 040 met as scheduled, at 0830 in Morrill Hall Room 206. The class roster showed 19 students enrolled. Fifteen attended, verified by sign-in sheet. Student participation was minimal.
  • No students attended office hours.

Additional Comments for the Spring 2016 Term at Oklahoma State University and Northern Oklahoma College

Students, I have only today (Sunday, 10 January 2016) returned from a trip to the Texas Hill Country, where the Modern Language Association of America held its annual convention. Consequently, I have not yet gotten all of the electronic materials associated with the courses I am teaching built and posted as appropriate. They are in process and will appear on the relevant pages (for Oklahoma State University students here, >>this is the link<<; for Northern Oklahoma College students here, >>this is the link<<) as they are developed. Look for many to appear here and linked through the relevant learning management systems (D2L and Blackboard) in the next couple of weeks.

I hope they will prove useful to you, and I look forward to discussing them with you.

Initial Comments for the Spring 2016 Term at Oklahoma State University

I have just received an email with my Spring 2016 teaching schedule. It seems I will be teaching three sections of ENGL 1213: Composition II:

  • Section 015, MWF 1030-1120, Classroom Building Room 217;
  • Section 023, MWF 1130-1220, Classroom Building Room 121; and
  • Section 040, MWF 0830-0920, Morrill Hall Room 206

It will be my first time teaching the course at Oklahoma State University (I have taught the equivalent elsewhere), and I am informed there will be programmatic changes, so the information already posted to my website will doubtlessly be changing. (It is a shame, because many of the materials already available on this website would have been helpful. Maybe they will still be.) That said, I have noted some familiar names on the already-full rosters, and I am glad of it.

I mean to continue several of the practices I have developed, retained, or resumed during the Fall 2015 term. Reports of classroom activities will continue, as will my efforts to draft sample assignments alongside my students. I am likely to continue to use riddle quizzes, as well; students will still benefit from practice in proofreading and critical thinking and argumentation such as they provide, and I will still benefit from the translation practice converting texts from older Englishes to modern English offers. Surveys asking after demographic and academic data, as well as impressions of the course, will likely also be forthcoming. I feel they have been helpful, and that seems reason enough to try them again.

More information will, of course, be forthcoming.