A Rumination on Academic Dishonesty

As I was chatting with an online group of which I am pleased to be a member, the topic of cheating in academic contexts came up. A number of those in the group are or have been involved in education as a profession, and a larger number have degrees at the undergraduate and graduate levels, so it’s something no few members of the group had experienced in one form or another; as I write this, nobody had admitted to engaging in the practice, but we’d all seen it and its effects. And so I got to thinking about my experience with cheating in and around the classroom.

How lovely a sight!
Photo by Polina Zimmerman on Pexels.com

I’ve not hidden the fact that I used to teach a technical writing class at Oklahoma State University. Given institutional demands, each section of that class taught there while I was engaged in that work followed a common set of assignments, of which one was the composition of a set of technical instructions. The assignment makes sense in the context, of course; a fair bit of technical writing is process documentation, whether as a descriptive thing or as an instructional aid, and most students took it reasonably seriously. They were able to see easily its application to their prospective careers, and many of them had had the experience of being given poor sets of directions, so they knew first-hand the annoyance of receiving them and were therefore inclined to do better than they had been done. (Maybe that’s a Platinum Rule: Do unto those better than they have done unto you. But that would be a decidedly different matter to treat than I mean to here.)

So much said, I did always have some smart-alec in the class, whether a student who claimed that the inclusion of new words into dictionaries represented the influence of “troublemakers” or one who decided to provide a detailed and richly-illustrated set of instructions for how to address some critter or another that was coming in to mess with crops or livestock. (That I had grown up in Central Texas was something I let my students know in most every class, and many classes also learned that my family comes from Midwestern farming stock. I don’t know why they thought it would be shocking to me, as seemed to be the case. Ah, well.) And I always had one or more who thought they’d be able to find some process with which I was presumably unfamiliar and simply copy others’ work as their own.

Cheating long predates AI, as the online discussion acknowledged.

One of those last sort of students was a woman I’ll call Trig. In class, Trig presented herself as a much put-upon wife and mother, struggling to earn her own education while caring for one child and pregnant with another while her husband worked long hours away from home in the oilfields. It was a common enough thing, to be sure, and while I sometimes found her in-class comments annoying, it was usually the kind of annoyance stemming from I-just-answered-this-question-for-another-student-why-didn’t-you-listen rather than from some deeper thing. For the most part, I found her pleasant enough to deal with, and although her first major assignment wasn’t done spectacularly well, it was solid and reasonably good. I’m sure an employer would be reasonably pleased to receive it in the workplace, or work on that level of performance.

On the technical instructions, though, Trig decided that she, like many others who sat for that class with me when I taught it, would address herself to firearms. (Maybe they did understand that I grew up in Central Texas and thought the topic would be near and dear to my heart, those students. Trig, though, was not among them, I think.) She decided that she would break down the process of cleaning a sidearm, some model of Sig Sauer pistol or another. (It’s been a few years since I taught the class; some details fade over time even without me eliding others, such as the student’s name or enough information to identify her.) The topic didn’t attract undue attention from me; again, I knew where I was, and it was a common enough thing for a student to address. Nor was it particularly rare for me to see usage errors in the piece as I sat to read and review it. But it was odd to see duplicated periods and some specific comma-splice errors, things I’d not seen Trig have problems with on previous assignments, major or minor.

At that point, I selected a passage from Trig’s instructions, copying them and pasting them into a search–and, lo and behold! they turned up as coming from the arms-maker’s own online documentation, usage errors and all! So did the rest of Trig’s instructions, as reading the two documents side-by-side showed in short order.

Now, I’d already had some experience with grade appeals and the like at the institution, so I knew 1) there were eyes on my classrooms and 2) I had better be sure to follow policy. Fortunately, policy was pretty clear on the matter at that point, and I followed it, documenting everything I’d done, pulling down copies of Trig’s submission and her uncited source materials, and filling out the requisite paperwork. A facilitator was assigned to the case, and a meeting with that facilitator, Trig, and me soon happened.

Trig, as might be expected, disclaimed having plagiarized. She led off with pathos, reminding me and telling the facilitator of her home situation and claiming that she would never do such a thing, that I must be persecuting her somehow because of the differences in our beliefs. She also remarked that “there’s only one way to clean this gun,” and that I should know that.

I was aware of that, as it happened; like I said, Trig wasn’t the first to write on that topic for me. She also wasn’t the first to be sloppy in her copy-work, which I pointed out. “It’s got the same comma-splice errors,” I said, pointing to them on the printouts. “And the same double periods.”

It was at that point the facilitator closed his file folder and turned to Trig, telling her what she’d won: a notation on her transcript for having failed the course due to plagiarism, the inability to withdraw from the class for the term then in progress (thus ensuring the mark wasn’t subsumed by dropping the course), and a requirement to sit for a one course-hour academic honesty seminar for regular cost but no credit. I wasn’t “happy to ruin [Trig’s] life,” as I got screamed at me as Trig left the room; I’d’ve rather not had to deal with any of it. But I also couldn’t let the lie–and poorly-told–slide. I don’t know that I could now, and I’ve mellowed out quite a bit in my old age.

I am aware that the use of so-called generative AI presents issues of cheating far different and far harder to identify and prove than Trig’s little trip. I know that, while the pap it spits out after scraping other people’s work (including possibly this very commentary) and recombining it sounds somehow like every other piece, the word-choice and -order are likely largely new. I know that it “knows” enough to throw in citations, even if those citations are themselves hallucinatory, having less grounding in reality even than Asimov’s thiotimoline. I know about a great many of the problems involved in addressing the fraud of students presenting AI-spewing off as their own work, and I do not envy those who have to deal with them–especially since there is less and less extrinsic incentive to rebuke AI-vomit and more and more to simply let it, and the students who do it, pass.

As I noted to my online group on at least one occasion, it’s probably a good thing I’m more or less out of academe anymore, painful as it still is to have made my exit.

O! The stories I could tell! Maybe one of them could be yours? Fill out the form below, and we’ll talk about how I can help you get yours the way it needs to be!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

A Robin Hobb Rereading Series, Entry 456: Fool’s Quest, Chapter 36

Read the previous entry in the series here.
Read the next entry in the series
here.


After in-milieu commentary about selecting Skill-couriers and their practices, “An Elderling Welcome” begins with Fitz making a decent show of diplomacy and learning that he is, indeed, confronted by Rapskal. Rapskal introduces himself brusquely as the local military leader and begrudgingly agrees to conduct Fitz, Lant, and Perseverance to Kelsingra’s rulership. Fitz finds himself somewhat affected by the prevalence of Skill-stone in the construction of Kelsingra, and he contrasts what he sees in his present situation with what he had seen in the city previously, as well as what he knows of Dutiful’s impressions of Kelsingra.

Surely, such a thing can do much good…
Photo by Nihat on Pexels.com

At length, Rapskal leaves Fitz, Lant, and Perseverance to confer with his leaders, assigning a subordinate to see to them. Fitz presents himself diplomatically once again, and he and his companions are provided refreshment. After they attend to themselves, Fitz and his companions confer about next steps to take, and Fitz soon falls asleep.

Rest is interrupted by the arrival of Reyn Khuprus, who greets Fitz warmly and receives introductions as he has Fitz, Lant, and Perseverance follow him to a kinder reception than Rapskal had given them. Malta joins them there, apologizing for Rapskal’s behavior and welcoming them. She introduces Amber, attended by Spark, and Fitz finds himself taken up into the Fool’s performance as Reyn and Malta invite the rest to sit and eat with them. Fitz finds himself somewhat taken aback by the frank discussion of social structures at work in Kelsingra. Questions about Phron and their answers elicit sympathy from Fitz, and as Amber continues the conversation, Fitz is able to fill in more of his knowledge of his old friend.

After dinner, Phron joins his parents and their guests, and introductions are made. When Fitz offers to shake his hand, he is taken by the Wit and the Skill, and something like a Skill-healing is effected, although without intent. Phron is greatly eased, and Malta marvels at what has occurred. Fitz is shaken by the event, but he manages to explain at least some of the changes his magic has effected in Phron.

Amber redirects conversation, relating a version of her exploits since departing Bingtown and its environs. Malta asks for healing for the other Elderling children whose changes are proving difficult or dangerous, and Amber attempts to deflect conversation again by glossing the depredations Ellik and his followers wrought on Fitz’s home, eliciting a strong response. Talk returns to the Elderling children, and Fitz, noting caveats, agrees to assist them.

With gratitude, Reyn, Malta, and Phron retire, leaving Fitz, the Fool, Lant, Spark, and Perseverance to confer. Arrangements are made for the evening, and Fitz is convinced to accept a sleeping draught for which the Fool vouches.

There are several things that attract attention in the present chapter. That the Fool would present as Amber in a company composed of Traders is not to be wondered at, perhaps, nor is the ease with which Fitz fits himself to the presentation (including shifting his pronoun references to the Fool as Amber); he has had practice at it, after all. That Lant and even Perseverance adapt so readily is more noteworthy, although Fitz notes “There was something of Chade in Lant after all” (714), which comes off to my eyes as begrudgingly respectful of the younger man. In all, it is relatively impressive that the Fool’s presentation, and Amber’s narrative, would carry off so well as they do in the chapter. The writer being Hobb, however, good fortune for the protagonist is not to be trusted, especially with what the second volume of a trilogy is typically supposed to do: put the protagonist/s in a bad situation, from which they emerge in the final volume.

Comments about the social structures at work in Kelsingra also attract attention. Reyn comments to his guests that “Even after years of it, king and queen sit a bit oddly with us” [emphasis in original], adding that “After years of the Satrapy extorting money from the Bingtown Traders, we who were raised as Traders still wonder why anyone would think we preferred a monarchy. But it’s a convenient way for the outside world to see us” (714-15). I have opined, and at some length, about the social structure of the Traders, seeing in them echoes of the nascent United States (if with better reactions to some pernicious social problems), which Reyn’s commentary supports. There does still seem to be something of hereditary rule in force in Kelsingra, however; it must be recalled that the Khuprus Traders are outrageously wealthy (note this, this, and this, among others), and that wealth is, by the time of Reyn and Malta, largely inherited. While Reyn and Malta are both capable people, they had the luxury–Reyn more than Malta, admittedly–of developing their capabilities free from the brute-force concerns of “Do I have enough to eat not to die today?” that typify the lives of many of the other residents of Kelsingra before their emigration. That is to say, they began their lives with advantages that they have parlayed into prominence in Kelsingra; they had the opportunities to be first with dragons because their preexisting socioeconomic status afforded them as much. It is not entirely meritocracy at work–although, Traders being Traders, it is conceivable that the Khupruses would be shunted aside in favor of “better” merchants. It bears thought, another scholarly someday.

I note, too, the particularly Tolkienian resonance (yes, I know) of Fitz’s not-entirely-voluntary healing of Phron. I have written before (here) about the ways in which Fitz enacts the warrior-hero trope common to fantasy literature; he moves away from, but is still substantially grounded in, the Tolkienian iteration of the trope, or I understood him as being so at that point in his existence and in my own. (We ought to revise ideas and opinions as more information becomes available. It’s something with which many people struggle, clearly and unhelpfully.) Even with what I have come to believe since, I acknowledge that there is still enough to sustain such a reading, to look at Hobb as existing within the Tolkienian literary tradition although she is clearly drawing from other sources than Tolkien–or than just Tolkien, especially since she acknowledges her debt to him. In the present chapter, in addition to the martial and diplomatic aspects of the warrior-hero Fitz does not seldom deploy, there is something of “The hands of the king are the hands of a healer” (LotR V, ch. 8) about his interaction with Phron. While it is the case that Fitz has participated in Skill-healing previously, and to miraculous effect (something that edges towards Christ-referencing, as I think on it again), the present chapter, where the healing happens, and not entirely with Fitz’s approval, seems more…otherworldly than most of the examples in the Realm of the Elderlings corpus. It’s yet another thing that bears some thought and consideration, yet another scholarly someday I hope I live long enough to address.

I am still happy to write for you; fill out the form below to get yourself a piece begun!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

A Poem I Might Ought to Have Workshopped More

Even in showing utopian futures–
For example
Those shining Starfleet days to come
With concertos played and plays performed
A shining-headed captain tooting his flute–
It is only the older arts that are seen
Unless there is some pop-point to be made
About kids these days and their newfangled ways

Qapla’!
Photo by Kevin Malik on Pexels.com

It must be remembered
“U” comes long after “dys,”
Something familiar from dictionaries and thesauri
No few writers have all too clearly used,
And it’s not likely the lawyers were lonely
Being sent away

Even,
As rarely,
When new arts are made
To feature in those hopeful futures,
Think of where the poets appear
And consider if it is not the case that
Another Chixulub is ready to form

I remain happy to write for you; fill out the form below to get a piece started!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

A Robin Hobb Rereading Series, Entry 457: Fool’s Quest, Chapter 35

Read the previous entry in the series here.
Read the next entry in the series
here.


A brief excerpt from Bee’s dream journal precedes “Kelsingra.” The chapter opens with Fitz and the rest taking such sleep as they can. When Fitz is woken by Perseverance coming off of watch, his Wit-sense responds to the presence of a larger predator that, upon investigation, proves to be a large bear showing the initial decrepitude of age. Fitz directs his companions to minimize the danger to them and reaches out to the bear through the Wit, but the bear attacks. The Fool and Spark flee through a Skill-pillar, while the rest scramble up trees and look on in anguish as the animal destroys their provisions.

An image of an armored lone figure holding a single-edged sword and staring out at a frozen city, predominantly in shades of purple
You knew it had to be…
Frozen History by MeetV on DeviantArt, here, and used again for commentary.

After the bear leaves, Fitz, Lant, and Perseverance take stock of what remains and reestablish their camp as best they can. That done, they prepare to follow the Fool and Spark, Fitz speaking plainly of what might befall them. Steeling themselves, they plunge through the Skill-pillar, emerging to find the Fool and Spark before them and angry dragons in evidence. As Fitz directs Lant and Perseverance to take what little shelter there is, the dragons speak to him. As Elderlings approach, Fitz presents himself formally, beginning to defuse the situation as the arrival of additional forces makes violence an unpleasant option. Arrangements are made to conduct Fitz and his group to Kelsingra’s leadership.

The present chapter is not the first part of the Realm of the Elderlings corpus to bear the name; it follows the fourth chapter of City of Dragons in that. Correspondences between the two chapters are limited, although there are some to be found. I’m not sure that there is enough to make any claims about parallel functions; I rather doubt that there is, although I’ve not done the kind of close reading of the two texts against each other that would reveal whether or not there is in any real sense. It’s another scholarly someday, I suppose, if perhaps a winter day due to the brevity I would expect from such a thing.

There are a couple of other things of interest to me as I reread the chapter. One of them is the reinforcement of the idea, going back to the Tawny Man novels, that the dragons communicate with each other and with their Elderlings through the Skill. The implication that the Skill is some lingering trace of Elderling heritage seems clear to me, although I tend to think that it is something that has grown up as the Realm of the Elderlings corpus has extended rather than something that was planned at the outset–but I’ve made comments about that kind of thing before. And it’s not something with which I find fault; people change, and so the work that they do will also change. Nor yet is it necessary for something to be perfect before it gets going.

The other that stood out was the dragons’ inability to find the Fool, the Elderling blanket serving to conceal him from their sight (although not their sense of smell). The implications of that that emerge for me are significant. That there is a limit to the dragons’ abilities is of import; they are often shown as being super-predators and, while some fight against them seems possible, odds are never good for those who oppose them. That the Elderlings of old seem to have produced materials that thwart draconic senses is also suggestive, prompting questions of factionalism and rebellion among them. There’s not enough in the text, certainly at this point, to do more than make a vague suggestion, and I don’t expect that there is some sort of parallel to The Silmarillion waiting in Hobb’s notes for some future editor or scholar to find that would elaborate on it, but what is fantasy for if not for prompting the imagination?

I remain happy to write for you; fill out the form below to get yourself a piece begun!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

On the Recent Flooding in the Texas Hill Country

First, let me report that my family is safe and I am safe. Second, let me say that I am not asking for anything for me or mine; we are safe, and we are well, and we are not those in need at the moment. But there are many, many people in and around the town where I grew up who are, because, early on 4 July 2025, a strong storm dumped a whole lot of water in a very short time on the headwaters of the Guadalupe River. The sudden rainfall triggered a flash flood of historic proportions; estimates I’ve seen put it at the second-highest levels of flooding on record, and reports I’ve seen indicate that the flood and flow meters that monitor such things were knocked out of commission by the flooding. Footage I’ve seen puts the river over roads that I don’t recall ever seeing go underwater, and pictures I’ve seen tell of damage that will take years to fix–in those cases where it can be fixed.

This #KerrvilleStrong image comes from Scooty Garrett.

Because it is also the case that there have been dozens of lives lost in this–unlike the flood of my own experience in 2002, which somehow managed to spare people. No few of them were children camping along the banks of the Guadalupe River as they have for decades, whose cabins were ripped from their foundations in the pre-dawn hours by waters that rushed in before there was time even to gasp in surprise at their arrival. No few others were holiday goers, in and around Kerrville to celebrate, staying in RVs beside the water and waking to terror when they had gone to sleep in idyllic peace before. And there are few if any words of comfort that can be found in such days; such as there are surpass my ability to speak or write them.

I have done what little I can do, which is all too little against the demand. What else I can do, and what I do do, is to point out that donations to a local relief fund can be made here: https://cftexashillcountry.fcsuite.com/erp/donate/create/fund?funit_id=4201. Another is here: https://www.kerrvillechamber.biz/foundation-kerrville-area-rebuilding-recovery-fund/. Please give if and what you can to help the folks in my hometown and both up- and downstream from it. I’m familiar with the Community Foundation from my nonprofit work; they’re local folks and have been in town for a good long while. I expect that giving done through them will get where it needs to go to do what the community needs.

Another Rumination on US Independence Day

It is somewhat odd to me that, as I look back over this webspace, I’ve only had one prior post come out on this date, and that relatively recently. Given how calendars tend to work and that I’ve got more than ten years posting here, I’d’ve expected to have marked the occasion more than once before–but such hasn’t been the case. Some, I’m sure, will accuse me of anti-patriotism or anti-Americanism for it; it wouldn’t be the first time, and I’ve my doubts it will be the last. After all, how many people who have bedecked themselves in red, white, and blue, draped themselves in flags, and shouted their jingoism with full throat are themselves thusly accused?

Someone’s having a bang-up time…
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

This is not about that, though.

I believe I’ve noted before that holidays–not just this one, but the fact of the holiday today invites reflection on holidays generally–are…difficult for me. I’m not a celebratory person by nature or habit (which is the case is not entirely clear); I am…wary of revelry and the indulgence that often accompanies it, certainly for myself. And it’s not, or not just, and issue of wanting to maintain appearances; were I more concerned with how I look to others, I would make a point of being out more among the day’s festivities than I have yet been. I’ve put in appearances, now and again, but rarely; I’ve attended the big Fourth of July event in my hometown exactly once, for example, and I’ve never made it to any of the other major area events for the day. Instead, I’ve either worked the day, or I’ve kept more or less to home–although that’s not really different from most other days for me; they find me working or home, rarely “going anywhere” or “doing anything.” But that’s not a new observation for me, either.

Such ruminations, such reflections, are typical of my holiday experience. I fail to feel what those around me do, and instead find myself living largely in my head. (Again, that’s not really different from most other days for me.) I don’t much feel connected to the traditions being honored, which I will stress is an issue of me more than it is of them; I am not owed outreach in this regard, and I am not complaining that I do not receive it, but am simply observing that I do not and that I do not seem to have it in me to reach out, myself. While such things as the cookout happen with me–I do enjoy doing so, but that’s another thing that’s not different from most other days for me, and I keep in mind Robb Walsh’s comment in one or another of his cookbooks that there’s a perversity in heating your house while you’re trying to cool it off–I don’t necessarily understand why so many of the other surrounding traditions have grown up or continue, and they don’t speak to me at this point in my life. Fireworks are pretty, yes, but they’re also expensive, and neither pets nor people with many forms of PTSD do well with them. Parades are neat, yes, but I’ve marched in enough of them to know they’re also markedly uncomfortable. A day off is nice, for those who can get it, but a whole lot of those who can make things an awful lot worse for those who can’t–and I’ve been one of the ones who can’t pretty often in my life.

I suppose that’s moving toward an actual point, here. Celebrate what you celebrate, sure, but keep in mind as you do that what you do still affects others. That it’s a holiday doesn’t mean you should be a jerk.

But that’s yet another thing that’s not really different from any other day.

Help me keep doing this by having me write for you–all human-done, no AI!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

A Rumination on #Kzoo2026

That I have done and still do academic conferences is not a secret; I’ve mentioned it more than a few times. That I have focused a lot of that doing on the International Congress on Medieval Studies, held on the campus of Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, Michigan, is also not a secret; in this webspace, I’ve written for or about it here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here, if not also elsewhere, as well as referring to it in my About page, my reported Abstracts, and my too-slowly-ongoing Fedwren Project. It should not be a surprise, then, that when the Tales after Tolkien Society, of which I remain a member and an officer, posted its initial call for papers for the 2026 iteration of the Congress, I took note.

I have stared out at a lot of these…
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

I had known about the sessions that are on offer for the 2026 Congress; I was involved in drafting the texts of the proposals and discussion of what and how to send them out. I was somewhat surprised to see that three sessions got accepted; the cosponsored one is not unusual, but that there were two paper sessions in addition was. Tales after Tolkien does not often do so well, but I guess, given the alignment of the three sessions (all of them treat adaptation more or less explicitly, each focusing on a different aspect of how the medieval gets re-presented to current-contemporary audiences), that there’s an expectation of papers to fill the sessions. (If you have an idea, send it in to them; it’ll be nice to have the company.)

I’ll be doing my part, as might be expected. One of the things about having so many scholarly somedays as I have is that I can easily pull on one or another of them for such purposes, take the opportunity the demand to produce provides to develop an idea I have had in passing. Given how many such somedays I’ve pointed out–most frequently with reference to Robin Hobb, as might be expected, but not exclusively with reference thereto, I don’t believe–I should have no trouble looking back and finding one thing I can pitch for a roundtable and another I can pitch for a paper session. (Congress rules prohibit presenting in more than one of each kind of session, with one notable exception that I’ll not get into here.) A roundtable talk generally runs five minutes or so, with discussion following, and that translates into something like 750 words; my normal blog posts run around 500 words anymore, so stretching to half again that much is not too much of a struggle. A conference paper is more variable; for me, such things run from around 2,600 to around 3,900 words, depending on how many other people are in the session–eminently doable for work I care about and that will necessarily have some citation and quotation in it (meaning I don’t have to come up with the whole text; I just have to identify what text needs to be present, which is its own challenge). I’ll have things to say, to be sure.

Determining just what my topics and approaches will be will take some doing, of course. So, too, will deciding whether or not I will attend the Congress in person or only remotely. The latter has been how I have done things in the past several years, not only because of COVID-19 dislocations but also because of my own attenuation from academe and, frankly, financial concerns. Getting from central Texas to Michigan isn’t easy or inexpensive, after all, and time away from my family is not always good for me. (That said, time to myself is not always bad for me, either, and it may well be good for them to have some time with me away…) I’ve got time to make some of those choices, though, and I look forward to putting in the thinking time of making them–as well as the time and effort I will spend on putting together my presentations.

Somehow, even after all the time, even after the disappointments, I still enjoy doing this kind of work.

It’s not just conference-writing that I do, though I do that. Maybe you could use some help with yours? I definitely do that.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

A Robin Hobb Rereading Series, Entry 456: Fool’s Quest, Chapter 34

Read the previous entry in the series here.
Read the next entry in the series
here.


After a letter from Malta and Reyn that politely but tersely addresses what appear to be ongoing concerns between Kelsingra and the Six Duchies, “Dragons” begins with Fitz quizzing Lant and Perseverance about the passage of the Fool and Spark. They have no further answers for him, so they eat, and Fitz notes the improvements to the campsite the pair have made in his absence.

Shining brightly amid the darkness…
Photo by Magda Ehlers on Pexels.com

Perseverance sits awake with Fitz for the first watch of the night and asks about the way the Fool and Spark are dressed, meeting Fitz’s answers sullenly. Later, after watches are traded, Fitz finds himself wakeful and joins Lant at watch. Lant asks his own questions of Fitz and is answered, although he is less sullen than he is whining in his receipt of those answers.

Further conversation is interrupted by the return of the Fool and Spark through the Skill-pillar. Spark is badly affected, and the Fool sports Silvered skin. Fitz directs Lant and Perseverance to attend to Spark and directs his attentions to the Fool. Managing to secure a glove over the Fool’s Skilled hand, Fitz guides his friend to where Perseverance and Lant attend Spark, and there asks for a report of events. The Fool lays out his reasoning and proceedings, and Fitz notes the uncertainty of Spark’s recovery.

At the Fool’s suggestion, Fitz looks for the camping equipment they had had together in that place after the Fool had died. With assistance from Lant, he finds it, and camp is reassembled. With that done, the Fool resumes his narrative, if with some prompting. Fitz learns that the Fool had gone to Kelsingra, navigating from echoes of draconic memories he had imbibed, finding the Skill well and touching what of the Silver he could. Doing so provoked the wrath of the Elderlings and the dragons, and the Fool and Spark fled to a ruined chamber, escaping from it only narrowly and returning to where they now sit.

The early portion of the present chapter puts Perseverance in a position not unlike that Fitz occupies with the Fool years before. Indeed, some of the boy’s phrasing in the current moment echoes that of the earlier man quite closely, and I am reminded again both of the fraughtness of gender performativity in the Realm of the Elderlings and of the need to update the Fedwren Project more than I have done. There are several scholars’ works already noted in it that speak to the issue; I have to wonder, I have to hope, that there is more current work that takes in the more recent entries in the Realm of the Elderlings corpus. It certainly presents itself plainly enough, not through what may or may not be a metaphorical treatment as some other things might or might not have been–but, as with several things, I am not the person to carry out a treatment of the matter, having neither the situated nor the invented ethos to address it.

Not entirely related: I appreciate the references to Rapskal and Heeby made in the Fool’s narrative. They are not named, and sensibly; despite who the Fool does know under the guise of Lady Amber, he would not have any reason to know, or even to know of, Rapskal and the dragon he serves. But it is entirely in keeping with their characters that they would jealously guard the Silver and move to violence before any other concern, and it is suggestive that some uses of the Skill-stone still seem to elude the Elderlings of Kelsingra at this point in the overall narrative. I find myself wondering if and how that will develop if and as Hobb presses ahead with her series (or if there is a Brian to Hobb’s Frank waiting somewhere, although a Christopher to her JRR might well be preferable).

I am somewhat struck with Fitz’s handling of matters in the present chapter. He seems to have a fairly decent handle on himself, which is…uncommon for him, even with his years and experience. So much said, it’s a good thing to see; how long it will last, though, I don’t recall. I guess I need to do more rereading…

I’m still happy to write for you; fill out the form below to get yourself a piece begun!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

Briefly on an Idle Half-Hour or So

As happens from time to time, I found myself in a coffee shop of a morning recently. My wife had a couple of things she needed to do in the next town up from where we live, as did I, but I got done before she did and, rather than hover over where she was, I took myself off for another cup of coffee and a little pastry. (The coffee was alright, and the pastry was nice enough. It was a good little snack, though I really don’t need more snacks.)

A familiar enough scene…
Photo by Afta Putta Gunawan on Pexels.com

I hadn’t necessarily expected to have the available time, so I didn’t set out with my usual accoutrements for going to a coffee shop. I didn’t have my journal with me to write in, I didn’t have a book with me to read, and I didn’t have any work with me to do. Consequently, I found myself sitting alone at the coffee shop, enjoying a pastry for less long than I should have done and sipping slowly at a cup of coffee, and I had the leisure to simply sit and watch and listen.

It was clear to me as I sat there that the coffee shop has a dedicated population of regular customers. A great many of the people popping in and through while I sat seemed to know each other and to be on good terms. Several stood around, their own cups of coffee in hand, talking together seemingly amiably; I was not trying to listen closely, but tone carries. A few others seemed to be engaged in some meeting–again, I wasn’t trying to listen, but things carry–and they seemed to get on well together. Too, there were a few working on some project or another, laptops open and earbuds in, doing as I have often done.

In all, it was a pleasant experience. I don’t often get to sit and watch; when I go to a coffee shop, I’m usually one of the people working or one of the people in a meeting, and I don’t go out often enough to be a regular anywhere anymore. Aside from <one bookstore [link Books to Share post]>, one or two places in the town where I grew up, and a since-closed tavern in Brooklyn, I haven’t really been a regular anywhere anywhen; I tend to go home and stay there unless there’s some cause to go out, and “because I want to” rarely suffices for that. I wonder if I should let it be so more often.

I did not stay much longer than it took me to sip away my cup of cooling coffee. My wife’s errands came to their end, and there’s only so long I can keep my seat on most coffee shop chairs. But it was nice to get to simply sit and sip, and I should probably try to do it again sometime.

If you’d like me to write for you, that can be arranged; reach out through the form below!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!

Might There Be a Midyear Truce in This Ongoing Campaign?

Year after year
The rallying cry sounds out
Even when the battle is as far away as it can be
As it is now
And there should be quiet

A belligerent?
Photo by Toni Cuenca on Pexels.com

The salvos are still firing off
The bombs are still falling
And there are screams to drown out the sounds of either
But no shouting will silence this ongoing war
However many or mightier the other fights may be
Because
Of course
This one little bit of performance actually matters

In such times as these, what connects us to our shared humanity is singularly important. Help secure your connection; have me write for you–all original work!

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Or you can send your support along directly!